Reagan White House Solar Panels

See the description and trailer below.

Reagan white house solar panels.

President ronald reagantook office in 1981 and the solar panels were removed during his administration. When the reagans moved into the white house in 1981 they inherited 32 solar panels generating carbon free electricity on the west wing roof. This symbolic installation was taken down in 1986 during the reagan presidency. A letter to the president from his national security adviser richard allen reflects the antisolar sentiment that prevailed at that moment in the white house.

The white house did not have solar panels in 2000. Reagan took solar panels off the white house. In 1979 jimmy carter in a forward looking move installed solar panels in the roof of the white house. Reagan saw the solar panels installed by carter for what they were a public relations stunt and ordered them dismantled.

But in a curious parallel with the current occupant of the white house the panels weren t actually removed until 1986 five years after reagan took office. In 1991 unity college an environmentally centered college in maine acquired the panels and later installed them on their cafeteria. The 32 panels were ripped out in 1986 as yes you guessed right. Reagan s political philosophy viewed the free market as the best arbiter of what was good for the country.

To understand what happened we have to go back to the reagan administration. Five years later president reagan inexplicably had the free clean energy sources removed. Author natalie goldstein wrote in global warming. Here is a video we created on the issue.

It was clear reagan had a completely different take on energy consumption. Reagan who didn t think much of solar energy also allowed the tax credit carter had instated to lapse. Under reagan funding was cut for the newly formed department of energy and in 1986 when the white house needed roof repairs under the solar thermal panels the reagan administration removed the panels and quietly decided to not reinstall them claiming it simply wasn t a cost effective option.